当前位置：首页 > 范文大全 > 实用文>GRE写作高频词汇

GRE写作高频词汇

2022-09-06 08:28:38 收藏本文下载本文

“空空妃”通过精心收集，向本站投稿了6篇GRE写作高频词汇，以下是小编为大家整理后的GRE写作高频词汇，希望对大家有所帮助。

GRE写作高频词汇

篇1：GRE写作高频词汇

数量词在新GRE写作考试中会经常用到，多样化的用词能让你的文章增色不少，更容易吸引考官的注意取得高分。作为高频词汇中最有价值的一部分，请每位考生都好好掌握运用。

一些 a range of ;a variety of ;a series of ;an array of

无数 innumerable ;countless

许多 plenty of ;many ;much ;a great deal of ;a lot of ;ample

非常多(大)的 tremendous

依序列举 list in sequence

篇2：GRE写作高频词汇

时间词常用于举例和论证，合理运用能更好的展示凸显你词汇量掌握和使用的能力。

过时的 outdated ;antiquated ;outmoded ;obsolete ;anachronistic

短暂的 ephemeral ;transitory ;transient ;short-lived

不合时宜的 anachronism

可持久的 durable ;able to stand wear ;last a long time

一再 time after time ;again and again

初始的 preliminary

前述的 aforementioned ;aforesaid ;former

自古到今 from ancient times to the present day ;down through the ages

年轻人 young people ;youngster ;youth ;young adult

老式的 old-fashioned ;out of date ;dated

偶尔 from time to time ;now and then ;once in a while ;at times

GRE写作实用高频词汇：成语及俗语及搭配方式

对成语俗语的使用和搭配，可以很直观的看出你的英文功底和日常阅读量的积累程度，好好运用绝对会为你的文章增光添彩，提升文章整体的评价，但在使用时也请务必保证准确性，如果使用不恰当可能会弄巧成拙。建议搭配一些句型句式使用更好。

想法 frame of mind;mind set;the way one is thinking

想出 come up with

找出 come up with;find out

利用 use;take advantage of

夸耀 brag about;boast about;show off;speak too highly of

照顾 take care of;take charge of;attend to;watch over

对…很了解 have a deep knowledge of…

对抗权威 stand up against authority;resisit boldly the authority

对…有信心 have confidence in

说清楚 articulate;verbalize;put in words;utter

接受…之美意 embrace the offer of…

累积 amass;accumulate;heap up;assemble

连系 tact;get in touch with;contact with

排除这可能性 rule out the possibility

等于 is equivalent to;equal

选择 choose;elect;opt for;pick;single out

发出 deliver;give out;hand over

绕路 detour;take a detour;take a roundabout way

GRE词汇精选推荐

今天的单词：

1.indiscriminate /??nd?’skr?m?n?t/ adj. 不加区别的, 不加选择的, 不加鉴别的, 不分好坏的

【解词】in-=not; discriminate v.分别, 辨别;(dis-=分开;crimin-=cern-=sure, separate;搞清，区别)

【例句】She disapproved of her son’s indiscriminate television viewing. 她不赞成儿子不加选择地收看电视。

2.scarce /sk?rs/ adj. 缺乏的, 罕见的

【解词】s-=ex-=out; carc-=carp-=果实(本义为“撕扯”，引申为“采摘”，又引申为“果实”);没有果实，即“缺乏的”，后又引申为“缺少的，罕见的”。

【例句】Eggs are scarce and expensive this month. 这个月鸡蛋又少又贵。

3.overlook /?ov?’l?k/ vt. 忽视;俯视

【例句】Don't overlook the slower students. 别忽视后进同学。

4.deplete /d??plit/ vt. 〈正〉使大大的减少; 使空虚

【解词】de-=not; ple-=full,fill,满，填充;没有填满的，引申为“使减少，使空虚”。

【例句】Both teams were severely depleted by injuries. 两个队都因队员受伤而实力大减。

5.subordinate /s?’b?d?net/ adj. 级别或职位较低的, 下级的;次要的, 附属的

【解词】sub-=under; ordin-=order,顺序，-ate为形容词后缀，因此这个词表示“处于下面的顺序的”，即“次要的，附属的”。

【例句】A private is subordinate to a corporal. 列兵的级别低于下士。

6.diffuse /d?’fjus/ adj. 四散的, 漫射的 vt. & vi. (使)扩散, (使)弥漫, (使)传播

【解词】dis-=分开，fus-=flow,流;流到各个地方的，引申为“漫射，四散的”。

【例句】His talk was so diffuse that I missed his point. 他的谈话漫无边际, 我抓不住他的要点。

7.inhibit /?n’h?b?t/ vt. 抑制;禁止

【解词】in-=里面;hibit-=hold;握在手里的，引申为“抑制，禁止”。

【例句】A small manufacturing sector inhibits growth in the economy. 制造业规模太小有碍经济增长。

8.bland /bl?nd/ adj. 乏味的;冷漠的;温和的 vi. 变得平淡无奇;丧失特性

【解词】来自词根mel-=软的，如melt 熔化。原指说软话的，奉承，讨好，后指温和的。

【例句】This soup is too bland for me. 这汤我喝起来偏淡。

9.expel /?k’sp?l/ vt. 驱逐;开除

【解词】ex-=out;pel-=push;推出去，即“驱逐，开除”。

【例句】expel a student from a university. 把学生从大学里开除。

10.consensus /k?n’s?ns?s/ n. (意见等)一致, 一致同意

【解词】con-=together，一起;sens-=feeling，感觉;所有人的感觉一样，引申为“一致同意”。

【例句】Notwithstanding the evidence, the consensus is that the jury will not reach a verdict. 尽管有证据，人们普遍认为陪审团将无法作出裁决。

GRE词汇精选推荐

1.aboveboard /?’b?v'bord/ adv. &adj. 正大光明的

【解词】above 在……上面;board 板子，因此aboveboard，即汉语中的“摆在台面上的”，引申为“正大光明的”。

【例句】You can rebuild trust, but only if your husband behaves in a manner that is completely aboveboard. 只要你的丈夫的行为方式完全光明正大，你们完全可以重新建立信任。

2.dissipate /‘d?s?pet/ vt. & vi. 驱散; 消失

【解词】dis-=away,离开;sip-=throw;扔;扔到别处去，引申为“驱散，消失”。

【例句】The sun dissipated the mists. 太阳驱散了雾。

3.auspicious /?’sp???s/ adj. 有前途的,有希望的,吉祥的,吉兆的

【解词】au-=bird; spic-=spect-=look;看;-ious为形容词后缀，表示数量很多。这个词的根本含义是“看到鸟儿飞过来了”，象征着吉祥。看到的鸟儿，是那只衔着橄榄枝的白鸽。

【例句】The project had an auspicious beginning. 这个计划有一个良好的开端。

4.maladroit /?m?l?’dr??t/ adj. 不机敏的,笨拙的

【解词】mal-=bad,坏的，不好的，adroit 灵巧的。因此这个词表示“不灵巧的”，即“不机敏的，笨拙的”。

【例句】a maladroit translation 笨拙的翻译

5.acquiesce /??kwi??s/ vi. 默认,默许 adj. 默认的 n. 默认,默许

【解词】ad-=to; quie-=quiet,安静的;-esce为后缀。因此表示“默许”。

【例句】They acquiesced in the decision. 他们默默赞同那个决定。

6.incipient /?n’s?p??nt/ adj. 开始的,初期的

【解词】in-=里面;cip-=take,拿;-ent为形容词后缀。因此这个单词表示“从外面拿进来的”，强调从外到里的过程，引申为“开始的，初期的”，类似“刚迈进门的”。

【例句】an incipient black eye. 刚发生的丑事。

7.propitiate /pr?’p???et/ vt. 劝解,抚慰,使息怒

【解词】pro-=pur-=through,一直;pit-=pet-=seek，争取。一直在争取，引申为一直做某事，再进一步引申为“劝解，抚慰”(一直在劝说)。

【例句】propitiate the gods with a sacrifice. 用祭品使上帝息怒

8.painstaking /‘penztek??/ adj. 极小心的;辛勤的, 辛苦的

【解词】来自pain和take的合成词。

【例句】You said in your address that “developing excellence is a slow, painstaking process”. 你在你的致词中说“发展卓越性是一个缓慢艰苦的过程”。

9.austere /?’st?r/ adj. 朴素的, 无装饰的;严格的; 严峻的, 一丝不苟的

【解词】auster-=severe,严重的。

【例句】an aloof and somewhat austere figure. 一位冷漠又有些冷峻的人物。

10.tacit /‘t?s?t/ adj. 缄默的,不说话的

【解词】tac-=silent.

【例句】The deal had the tacit approval of the President. 这笔交易得到总统的默许。

GRE写作

篇3：GRE写作优质词汇

GRE写作实用高频词汇：数量词

一些 a range of ;a variety of ;a series of ;an array of

无数 innumerable ;countless

许多 plenty of ;many ;much ;a great deal of ;a lot of ;ample

非常多(大)的 tremendous

依序列举 list in sequence

GRE写作实用高频词汇：时间词

时间词常用于举例和论证，合理运用能更好的展示凸显你词汇量掌握和使用的能力。

过时的 outdated ;antiquated ;outmoded ;obsolete ;anachronistic

短暂的 ephemeral ;transitory ;transient ;short-lived

不合时宜的 anachronism

可持久的 durable ;able to stand wear ;last a long time

一再 time after time ;again and again

初始的 preliminary

前述的 aforementioned ;aforesaid ;former

自古到今 from ancient times to the present day ;down through the ages

年轻人 young people ;youngster ;youth ;young adult

老式的 old-fashioned ;out of date ;dated

偶尔 from time to time ;now and then ;once in a while ;at times

GRE写作实用高频词汇：成语及俗语及搭配方式

想法 frame of mind;mind set;the way one is thinking

想出 come up with

找出 come up with;find out

利用 use;take advantage of

夸耀 brag about;boast about;show off;speak too highly of

照顾 take care of;take charge of;attend to;watch over

对…很了解 have a deep knowledge of…

对抗权威 stand up against authority;resisit boldly the authority

对…有信心 have confidence in

说清楚 articulate;verbalize;put in words;utter

接受…之美意 embrace the offer of…

累积 amass;accumulate;heap up;assemble

连系 tact;get in touch with;contact with

排除这可能性 rule out the possibility

等于 is equivalent to;equal

选择 choose;elect;opt for;pick;single out

发出 deliver;give out;hand over

绕路 detour;take a detour;take a roundabout way

GRE词汇解析：qualification

什么是Qualify a statement?

qualify 这个单词简直像一个恶魔一样缠绕着的考GRE的同学们，在填空和阅读中层出不穷。很多同学总是不能够理解这个单词，虽然我们在佛脚词汇表中把它翻译成“通过添加限定条件进行限定”，但是仍然过于抽象，所以今天我给大家举几个例子，来解释什么叫做qualify 。

1. 词典解读

qualify在词典中的解释为

(1) to reduce from a general to a particular or restricted form

(2) to make less harsh or strict

但总之我么能体现出当我们qualify一个东西后他变的没那么强烈了，从更普遍变得更狭窄了。这是什么感觉呢?我们来举两个例子大家就明白了。

2. 例子来啦

我们看这句话

Taxes on imports are too high.

我们会发现这句话说的很绝对，这句话是在告诉我们进口税就是太高了。而实际情况是这样的么?是所有的产品税都高么?所以这样过于绝对的话会显得不够专业，不够准确，我们来qualify一下。

Oftentimes, taxes on imports are too high.

不要小看这个oftentimes，加上这个单词，我们就完成了对一个过于absolute的论断进行了qualification的过程。因为我们知道并不是在任何时候，税都是高的啦。

常见的qualifier还有：sometimes, most often, most, most likely , appears, seems, suggests, indicates等等。

GRE写作优质词汇汇总分享

篇4：GRE写作：词汇积累

GRE写作：词汇积累

1.经常brainstorm可以表达一个特定意思的单词，找尽可能多的单词。

并且制作一个自己的list，上面是以中文意思为索引的同义英文单词，并且反复通过中文意思去回想可能用于表达该意思的英文词。

2.进行meaning negotiation practice

如果你还没有掌握一个单词，你可以进行meaning negotiation practice。在学习一个单词的时候，找很多这个单词的例句，通过例句不断猜测单词的意思，直到你找到了一个可以在所有的例句中都解释的通的意思，然后再去看答案。这种方式会促使你更加注意一个词汇的context和collocation，更加有助于你对于一个单词的language network的形成。

3. 单词进行例句背诵，例句仿写

对于已经学会的单词，如果你想去回炉把它训练成一个你在写作中可以很容易使用的词汇，你可对这个单词进行例句背诵，例句仿写等学习方式。

4. 最后，多读多写

想掌握好写作的用词，你要多读多写。特别是在写作中，刻意的去模仿别人使用高级词汇的例子，最后形成自己的写作风格。

GRE写作满分范文赏析

Six months ago the region of Forestville increased the speed limit for vehicles traveling on the region's highways by ten miles per hour. Since that change took effect, the number of automobile accidents in that region has increased by 15 percent. But the speed limit in Elmsford, a region neighboring Forestville, remained unchanged, and automobile accidents declined slightly during the same six-month period. Therefore, if the citizens of Forestville want to reduce the number of

automobile accidents on the region's highways, they should campaign to reduce Forestville's speed limit to what it was before the increase.

The argument above presents a sound case for arguing that if the region of Forestville wants to reduce the number of automobile accidents on the region's highways, they should consider reducing the speed limit to what it was before the increase in speed limit took place 6 months previously. However, there are some intermediate steps that one could take before jumping to the conclusion that reducing the speed limit is the only way in which traffic accidents can be reduced.

First of all, I would examine the actual number of traffic accidents that occurred before and after the speed limit increase and compare this to the size of the region and its driving population. For example, if the Forestville region's driving population is 1 million people, and the traffic accidents for a 6-month period before the speed increase totaled 100, then the 15% increase would amount to an additional 16 traffic accidents, or 116 total. For a population of 1 million, there may be other solutions to this increase besides reducing the speed limit to what it was. (The comparison to the region of Elmsford would only be helpful if the regions driving demography is comparable in terms of size and scope.) A public education campaign emphasizing driver safety and safe driving techniques may suffice to reduce the number of traffic accidents. Especially considering that if the number of accidents relative to the population is somewhat small, it is a fairly safe driving population anyway.

In addition, I would consider lengthening the time of the study. Six months may be a relatively short period of time for which to study the rate of traffic accidents. Upon a closer examination of when the accidents occurred, one might ascertain that most of the driving accidents occurred within a month of raising the speed limit, but that there have been relatively few additional accidents since that first phase-in period. Lengthening the study to a one-year period would help adjust for any untypical statistics and paint a more accurate picture of the long-term affects of the speed limit increase.

I would also examine what else was occurring in the region during the period of the study. For example, was there a major highway construction project happening during this time which would have added to the unsafe nature of raod travel? Are there any alternative explanations for why the increase in traffic accidents could have occurred, or is the increase in speed limit the sole variable? Looking at the type of accidents that occurred, I would examine whether these are the types of car accidents one would expect from traveling at a faster speed to corroborate the cause and effect relationship. Comments:

As in the sample 6 response, this writer sees some logic in assuming a connection between the higher speed limit in Forestville and the increase in auto accidents. Unlike the sample 6 on this topic, this response is neither as exhaustive in its analysis nor as impressively developed. The writer makes four points in the critique:

-- A statistical analysis might suggest that the 15% increase in accidents is not as significant as it might seem.

-- A car safety education campaign might be a better way to solve the problem.

-- A six month period might be too short a time on which to base major conclusions.

-- Other factors could have caused the increase in accidents.

Although each of these points is developed and sensibly supported, the critique is not sufficiently full to warrant a score of 6. The essay demonstrates good control but not mastery of the elements of writing: it contains good variety in syntax, including effective use of rhetorical questions. The occasional flaws (e.g., the somewhat garbled syntax in paragraph 3: ”.time for which to study the rate???“) do not detract from the overall strong quality of the critique. For all of these reasons, this response is strong but not outstanding, and thus merits a score of 5.

GRE写作满分范文赏析

The agrument is well-presented, but not thoroughly well-reasoned. By making a comparison of the region of Forestville, the town with the higher speed limit and therefore automobile accidents, with the region of Elmsford, an area of a lower speed limit and subsequently fewer accidents, the argument for reducing Forestville's speed limits in order to decrease accidents seems logical.

However, the citizens of Forestville are failing to consider other possible alternatives to the increasing car accidents after the raise in speed limit. Such alternatives may include the fact that there are less reliable cars traveling the roads in Forestville, or that the age bracket of those in Elmsford may be more conducive to driving safely. It is possible that there are more younger, inexperienced, or more elderly, unsafe drivers in Forestville than there are in Elmsford. In addition, the citizens have failed to consider the geographical and physical terrain of the two different areas. Perhaps Forestville's highway is in an area of more dangerous curves, sharp turns, or has many intersections or merging points where accidents are more likely to occur. It appears reasonable, therefore, for the citizens to focus on these trouble spots than to reduce the speed in the entire area. Elmsford may be an area of easier driving conditions where accidents are less likely to occur regardless of the speed limit.

A six-month period is not a particularly long time frame for the citizens to determine that speed limit has influenced the number of automobile accidents in the area. It is mentioned in the argument that Elmsford accidents decreased during the time period. This may have been a time, such as during harsh weather conditions, when less people were driving on the road and therefore the number of accidents decreased. However, Forestville citizens, perhaps coerced by employment or other requirements, were unable to avoid driving on the roads. Again, the demographics of the population are important. It is possible that Elmsford citizens do not have to travel far from work or work from their home, or do not work at all. Are there more people in Forestville than there were sic months ago? If so, there may be an increased number of accidents due to more automobiles on the road, and not due to the increased speed limits. Also in reference to the activities of the population, it is possible that Forestville inhabitants were traveling during less safe times of the day, such as early in the morning, or during twilight. Work or family habits may have encouraged citizens to drive during this time when Elmsford residents may not have been forced to do so.

Overall, the reasoning behind decreasing Forestville's speed limit back to its original seems logical as presented above since the citizens are acting in their own best interests and want to protect their safety. However, before any final decisions are made about the reduction in speed limit, the citizens and officials of Forestville should evaluate all possible alternatives and causes for the increased number of accidents over the six-month period as compared to Elmsford. Comments:

This outstanding response begins by noting that the argument is ”well presented.“ It then proceeds to discuss possible alternative explanations for the increase in car accidents and provides an impressively full analysis. Alternatives mentioned are that

-- the two regions might have drivers of different ages and experience; -- Forestville's topography, geography, cars, and/or roads might contribute to accidents;

-- six months might be an insufficient amount of time for determining that the speed limit is linked to the accident rate; -- demographics might play a role in auto accidents; -- population and auto density should be considered; and

-- the times of day when drivers in the two regions travel might be relevant.

The points are cogently developed and are linked in such a way as to create a logically organized critique. Transitions together with interior connections create a smoothly integrated presentation. For the most part, the writer uses language correctly and well and provides excellent variety in syntax. The minor flaws (e.g., using ”less“ instead of ”fewer") do not detract from the overall high quality of the critique. This is an impressive 6 paper.