看《唐吉坷德》名著的精选观后感
“可爱女人”通过精心收集，向本站投稿了14篇看《唐吉坷德》名著的精选观后感，以下是小编精心整理后的看《唐吉坷德》名著的精选观后感，供大家参考借鉴，希望可以帮助到有需要的朋友。
篇1：名著《唐吉坷德》英语读后感
During the summer vacation, I savored Don Quixote again.
The author of this book draws a caricature of the knight errant through the miserable experience of the mad Don Quixote. You see, it's the mill windmill, but he thinks it's a giant with three heads and six arms. So he urges the horse spear to rush away, but it's thrown to the ground and can't move. Even so, when the servant Sancho came to tell him again that it was not a giant but a windmill, he argued that it was the magician who turned the giant into a windmill. There are countless such actions, which are very funny and make readers laugh again and again. The author combines the description of the characters of different social classes with the description of the social reality, vividly reappears the domineering of the noble gentlemen and the ups and downs of the common people.
Don Quixote was a little squire who was fascinated by reading Knights' novels all day. He imitated the ancient knights and went out to adventure and did many ridiculous things. Although he is crazy, he hates tyranny and cruelty and opposes oppression. You see, once, his horse was injured by a group of porters. Regardless of the other side's more than 20 people, he resolutely fought with the other side and was finally knocked down to the ground. If I see more than 20 men holding sticks, I'm sure I'm not brave enough to go out. I'll either admit my misfortune or run away. And Don Quixote, knowing that the enemy is strong and we are weak, is still fighting for justice in the end. This spirit is really worth learning. Don Quixote is also very charitable, sympathizing with the weak and upholding justice. Once, he caught a wronged prisoner. In order to let him go, he reconciled and beat him once, although at last many prisoners ran away.
Don Quixote is a complex and contradictory man. He has some other bad habits. He thinks he's right and doesn't listen to others' advice. Sangqiu advised him not to cut down the windmill, but he didn't listen. At last, he was lifted up by the windmill and hurt. He was nervous again. When he saw a man coming to him, he thought that the other side was going to fight him, so he killed the other side with a knife.
The first time I read “Don Quixote”, I wanted to laugh, and did ridiculous things for Don Quixote. The second time I read it, I wanted to cry, for the domineering of aristocratic gentlemen and the ups and downs of ordinary people. The third time will naturally think from these cries and smiles. So, what do you read from it? Let's talk about it together!
篇2：名著《唐吉坷德》英语读后感
Don Quixote is the work of Cervantes, a Spanish writer in the 17th century. Of course, this is a great work, because the characters described by the author still exist today.
Man is the unity of spiritual substance. For Don Quixote, we will find him ridiculous at the beginning. Because what he did seemed so crazy. He sees himself as a just man, a man who acts with chivalry and justice everywhere. However, the author let us see is such a character, but did not do one thing right. Don Quixote's starting point is good. He should follow the chivalry spirit and do what he thinks is right. He also led an honest farmer, Sancho, to the world with him. He rescues the children who are bound and fights for those who are in trouble. Here we can't help but ask:
1. Since Don Quixote is doing a good job, we can treat him as a good man. But why do we get tired of him when we think about the aftereffects of his work?
2. Is there any madman like Don Quixote in reality?
3. In reality, what should we do when we encounter things that are unfair and do not conform to our own values?
Let me first answer the first question. Don Quixote's spiritual quality is good, but he does things regardless of the consequences, and only regards reality as his fantasy tool of chivalry, which is very stupid and undesirable. Blindly following the heroism of others will pay a heavy price.
Let's answer the second question. These people still exist in reality. Take some famous people who dare to tell the truth. There is nothing wrong with their courage to criticize the powerful and expose the darkness. But some people don't view the reality of customers and criticize them, and finally they leave the market bitterly.
The third question everyone has their own answers. But reason should be a criterion, and people should make correct decisions according to their actual situation and the situation of the event. We should advocate heroism, but we should base our actions on reason.
Reason is the measure of emotion, reality is the reflection of spirit. In a diverse world, only by polishing your eyes can you do the right thing.
篇3：名著《唐吉坷德》英语读后感
The protagonist of Don Quixote's novel, originally named Alonso jihada, was a local man. He was fascinated by the popular Chivalry Novels at that time and wanted to imitate the chivalry. He found a pair of tattered and incomplete armor from the antiquities of his family. He named it Don Quixote de Mancha himself. He also found a servant sangqiu and a milkmaid from the neighboring village, named Dulcinea, as his favorite person to serve him all his life. Then he rode on a thin horse and ran away from home. Don Quixote also acted according to the strange ideas in his mind, regarding windmills as giants, sheep as enemies, convicts as knights, wine bags as giants' heads, indiscriminately cutting and killing, causing many ridiculous things. His actions were not only useless for people, but also suffered from beating and suffering. When he got home for the last time, he was bedridden and finally understood. He made a will, and if the niece, the only heir, married the knight, her right of inheritance would be cancelled.
At first glance, Don Quixote, I think, is just a funny vulgar work. The nervous “brave spirit” of the protagonist is vividly displayed in the book, which makes people look down upon him even more. But savor carefully, and feel that there is a truth in the book. The most basic essence of people is to achieve their goals recklessly. In the process of realization, the chivalrous knight, who is as thin as a high pole, and the gentleman with fantastic ideas, always shows his integrity and kindness. This is the most noble spirit of human beings. Because it is too simple, many jokes are made.
When Cervantes wrote Don Quixote, he aimed at attacking, satirizing and fabricating the strange chivalrous novel and its bad influence on people. It was intended to be written as a few short stories. Later, it was written that he wrote in his life experience and ideal. His thought content became more and more rich, and his characters became more and more realistic, until he described the disaster brought by Spanish society to the people, and became an encyclopedia for us to understand and study the social politics, economy, culture and customs of Spain at that time.
This is Don Quixote. Although Don Quixote is funny, what about other people in reality? So, when we see Don Quixote, we should all reflect on ourselves. That's what I think after watching Don Quixote.
篇4：名著《唐吉坷德》英语读后感
I always wanted to read this famous book - I wanted to read it when I was in school, but I always missed each other and didn't see it. I finished reading today, but I was a little disappointed. I don't know why Cervantes created such an image of a “madman”.
Don Quixote was a declining aristocrat. He was addicted to Knights' novels and became obsessed with them. He found a pair of armor and rode on a skinny old horse. He began his imaginary journey of supporting justice and wandering the Jianghu. He is a pure and stubborn idealist, living in fantasy. In other words, he is a completely stubborn lunatic. He regarded windmills as giants, sheep as enemies, convicts as knights, and a common village woman as his princess. Repeatedly hit the wall, often head broken blood but unswervingly, infatuated. It's his servant sangqiu, who is fat and timid and greedy for a small price, who is still a normal man with flesh and blood. He will take advantage of his master's craziness and paranoia, play a little cleverness, and seize the opportunity to increase some benefits for himself. He is a real living man. Just like this, two other living treasures, a pair of unimaginable masters and servants, staged a funny farce for us. One of the most amusing scenes is that in the dark night, sangqiu is afraid to hold his master's thigh all the time and dare not give up. However, he is eager to describe courteously, which is really vivid and vivid.
The most touching ones in the book are some of Don Quixote's good friends. They never give up on Old Tang. They must try their best to cure his madness. They have used violent means - to put the old Tang in a cage and escort him home with arms; they have used the means of burning books and “pit” Confucianism - to burn all the Knights' novels in the old Tang family and even seal the study; they have used the means of concealing the sky and the sea - to pretend to be a knight, to pretend to be a princess in distress and so on, all in order to pull the old Tang from fantasy to reality. They really mean to their friends, especially for such a “terminally ill” crazy friend. They didn't give up, and even were wrongly wounded and beaten by old Tang. Life can have such a few friends, enough!
I just don't know the background of the times. I don't know what the intention of this episode is that some sangqiu, who was governor of the island for several days, handled several cases cleanly and fairly, but was forced to resign at last.
篇5：名著《唐吉坷德》英语读后感
When I first read Don Quixote's work, I thought that he was a funny vulgar work. The nervous “brave spirit” of the protagonist is vividly displayed in the book, which makes people look down upon him more and more. However, I think that the book asks for a certain truth. The essence of people's most basic is to achieve it recklessly for their own goals. From the book, we can see that A skinny Knight like a sorghum pole, the fantastic gentleman always shows his integrity and good nature in the process of realizing this, which is the highest spirit of human beings, but also because of his simplicity, he makes many jokes.
The task of Don Quixote has become a famous model in the world for learning. His character is complex. On the one hand, he is divorced from reality and always indulges in fantasy. He takes the estimation of his own strength and his motherland, and fails repeatedly. But on the other hand, his motive is pure and kind. He is determined to eradicate the demons in the world, oppose oppression, eliminate the strong and support the weak. He is full of selfless and fearless spirit. For the question of the crooked knights, his comments are always profound, clear and philosophical.
There are nearly 700 characters in Don Quixote's book, which describes a wide picture of life, truly and comprehensively reflects the contradictions of the Spanish Kingdom at the beginning of the 16th century, condemns the shamelessness of the aristocracy, and expresses deep sympathy for the sufferings of the people. I think it is this willingness that makes this work deeply loved by people all over the world, so that it is loved by 54 countries and regions in the world One hundred of the writers were selected as the best classics.
This is the charm of Don Quixote, and I am also deeply attracted by it. I read it over and over again, and I have many aftereffects after reading it.
篇6： 名著《唐吉坷德》英语读后感
What can anyone say about Don Quixote that hasn“t been said? The book”s been around for four hundred years, has inspired virtually every literary movement from the eighteenth-century picaresque to the most obscure works of twenty-first century postmodernism.
Don Quixote is one of the few books that merits casual references with the definite article （The Quixote）， and additionally is one of the few books to spawn a universally-recognized adjective （quixotic）。 How to even approach a book like Don Quixote, a book that has been, at some time or other, all things to all people? How to evaluate a cultural monolith? The simplest way, of course, is just to pay attention to the fact that Don Quixote, four hundred years after its initial publication, is still a hell of a read!
Sure, there are rough patches, yet: the mini-novels that interrupt the narrative of the first part for a hundred-odd pages would have been easy targets for some modern publisher“s blue pencil, the long essays on arms or piety can ring strangely to reader sensibilities, the descriptions are sometimes a vague mess, and yet the basic story, the basic concept holds up.
It”s hard to stay mad at Don Quixote: as frustrating as the plot can be at times, some archetypal lure lurks within the world of Cervantes“s Spain, some magic that draws us in, much like the world of chivalry that continues to draw Quixote himself through the progressively more painful wringer of situations.
The concept of the novel is simple: Alonso Quijano, landowner from La Mancha, is obsessed with his library of chivalrous books. Driven mad by the inconsistencies of plot, character and philosophy that fill each volume of these seventeenth-century precursors to the fantasy novel, Quijano resolves to restore dignity to the lost profession of knight-errantry, assembles a rudimentary sword, suit of armor, and horse （the eternally-suffering-and-spavined Rocinante）， and sets out into Spain in his quest for glory.
In return for this act of hysterical faith, he finds violent innkeepers, malevolent thieves, cynical shepherds, sadistic nobility, and even （due to Avellaneda”s false sequel to the book“s first volume, one of the most famous pieces of fan-fiction ever written） an inferior （and, in the novel, invisible） Quixote impostor.
The first few scenes involve Quixote alone against the contemporary world, but before a hundred pages have elapsed Cervantes introduces Sancho Panza, Quixote”s gullible, bloated and homily-spouting squire, who in conjunction with Quixote provides the spark for endlessly bizarre discussions in which Quixote“s heightened, insane conception of the world is brought crashing to earth by Sancho”s sly pragmatism （discussions which occasionally end with Quixote threatening to pummel Sancho in order to shut him up
Once joined together, it“s very difficult to imagine Don Quixote and Sancho ever being split apart: the two are the original comic duo, locked into perpetually and mutually exclusive views of the world, and in and of themselves--whether Sancho is being asked to give himself hundreds of lashes in order to disenchant Quixote”s swineherd love interest, Dulcinea, or whether Quixote is mixing a potion based on olive oil and bitter herbs that will, in theory, cure all of Sancho“s Quixote-caused earthly wounds--the Knight and the Squire personifies the thematic conflict that propels the work.
In general, this is why Don Quixote remains one hell of a read--even today. The reader faces, in the same moment, an ideal view of the world （the world as enchanted, antiquated, idyllic） and the brutal facts of the actual world （the world as material, modern, loath to believe in knights.）
Quixote hacks at the belly of ogres in an inn basement, and is rewarded by a jet of wine in his face and a hefty bill for damages. He tries to rid the land of giants, and is spun, lance-first, by a powerful windmill he spears in the attempt. He attempts to liberate a statue of the Virgin Mary, which he believes to be a damsel in distress, from her captors, and in return is beaten up by priests.
Throughout, Sancho is there to say exactly what the reader is likely thinking--those aren”t giants; Dulcinea isn“t beautiful; none of this can be real--only to be rewarded with a lecture from Don Quixote about how he is beset by enchanters, who frustrate his every move by replacing the facts of his world, at the last moment, with devil”s illusions that bear an uncomfortable resemblance to our own reality. It“s a single joke repeated across a thousand pages, and yet it”s b enough to bring a laugh every time.
Quixote“s insistence on his own madness in the face of innumerable arguments to the contrary, many of which take the form of cat scratches, cracked bones and missing teeth, makes him an interesting character because we know--or we think we know--that Quixote is just wrong. Yet, despite all of the pain he suffers in pursuit of that wrong, he continues to believe that he”s right. So we read on page-after-page, waiting to see how much more the man who believes himself a knight is able to take before he gives in--whether, in the end, Quixote will give in at all.
We read not only for page-after-page, but for year-after-year, century-after-century, pulled by the cognitive dissonance that surrounds the knight like his own cloud of malicious enchanters. In the process, just as Quixote builds his castles from inns and criminal campfires, so we build castles of speculation from what we find in Cervantes“s Spain, at once so brutally real and so dream-like, the realm of archetype and myth founded on dreary life. We, like Don Quixote, are driven to hallucinate by what might be, in the end, just a very good story.
With Don Quixote, Cervantes has accomplished an enduring act of literary alchemy: just as Quixote is combined with Sancho, so is fantasy combined with reality, the eternal with the everyday, and like the combination of matter and anti-matter, the explosion of aesthetic power is, in magnitude, infinite, propelling readers from the earth--at first facing inward at what was left behind on the page, then, forgetting the earth, outward into meaning--farther and farther toward the dream-like stars.
篇7：有关话剧《唐吉坷德》的精选观后感
有人说他是一个幻想家，但我却认为他是一个理想主义者，他所向往的理想和他所奉行的原则并不全是其实制度的产物，其中也包含着人文主义的内容。在教会严重束缚人们思想的黑暗时代，这样一位能够冲破思想牢笼，寻求人性解放的人，是时代的先驱。
勇敢，无畏
在西欧的中世纪，教会控制了人们的思想，这似乎很像中国的秦朝，就差焚书坑儒了。而人文主义精神的出现，是对思想的的一次解放，它使人们变得更加勇敢，无畏。例如在蒙铁尔郊原，屹立着许多大风车，唐吉诃德把它们当作凶暴的巨人，对它们发起战斗，他握着长矛，冲了上去。风却刮得很狂烈，骑士被掀倒在地上，他的长矛也摔烂了。但这次冒险使他泄气了吗?一点没有，他说风雨中这点痛算什么，擦干泪，不要怕，至少我们还有梦。(他以前一定当过水手)
追求理想
西欧的中世纪是个特别”黑暗的时代“。教会教会成了当时封建社会的精神支柱，把上帝当做绝对的权威，人们似乎丧失了对美好事物追求的权利。堂吉柯德的行动也说明他不安于平凡闲暇的生活。他不仅有理想，而且为了实现理想可以不顾个人安危，不顾失败。有人说塞万提斯笔下的唐吉柯德是一个可笑的人物：”他骑着一匹瘦马，手握长矛，心中爱恋着他的情人开始了他的骑士生涯。“但正是他这种”单枪匹马“的形象，才向我们展现出一种坚持理想，奋不顾身的献身精神和斗争精神所以最后唐吉诃德回到自己家里后，他被作为一个受人爱戴的，心灵高尚的绅士与世长辞了。
坚定信念
与其说他是幻想者，不如说他是一个理想主义者，在那个”黑暗的时代"里，他遭受了无数人的讥讽，却依然坚定自己，他的所作所为的出发点有着高尚的一面，奉行一种崇高的原则。他要做一个行侠仗义的骑士，要锄强扶弱，伸张正义，并为此而奋不顾身，具有自我牺牲的精神。在众人的讥讽之中，有多少人能够坚定自己的理想，始终为之努力奋斗，又有多少人能够坚持自我，在茫茫人海中不随波逐流，又有多少人能够微笑面对挫折，越挫越勇。虽然他幻想的事物也许是可笑的，但这种坚定的信念，是值得我们学习的。
有关话剧《唐吉坷德》的精选观后感
篇8：看小说《唐吉坷德》的个人观后感
著名批判家别林斯基曾说过：“在欧洲，一切著名文学作品中，把严肃和滑稽、悲剧性和喜剧性、生活中的琐屑和庸俗与伟大和美丽表现得如此水乳交融的典范仅见于《唐吉柯德》。”不错，在我看来，《唐吉柯德》就是一部涂抹着喜剧油彩的悲剧，一部反骑士小说的骑士小说，一场庄严的闹剧。
《唐吉柯德》是一部讽刺灭亡了的骑士制度的长篇小说。主人公阿伦索·吉哈达读当时流行的骑士小说入了迷，便效仿骑士外出游侠，改名为唐吉柯德，选了一个邻村的姑娘作为他为之效力的贵妇人。一路上，他因脑子里的胡思乱想，干了许多荒.唐可笑的事：向商人挑战、身受重伤;把风车当作巨人;把羊群当作敌军;把苦役犯当作受害的骑士;把酒囊当作巨人头，不分青红皂白，乱砍乱杀，最后被关进笼子送回家来。第三次被一个公爵所骗，险些丧命，最后他的邻居装扮成骑士打赢了他，将他送回家。唐吉柯德临终前幡然醒悟，让自己的侄女永远不要嫁给读过骑士小说的人。
作者生活的年代骑士小说盛行，这些小说大多荒诞不经，影响极坏。作者为了讽刺这种骑士小说，便塑造了唐吉柯德这样的人物，以他荒.唐可笑的经历向我们展示了骑士小说的危害。作者巧妙地把唐吉柯德荒诞离奇的游侠行为与16世纪末17世纪初的西班牙社会联系在一起，既向我们描绘了一幅时代画卷，又强烈地讽刺了上层统治阶级，并对人民的苦难予以了深切的同情。于是，唐吉柯德，这个“不畏强暴、不恤丧生”的人物形象，这个立志扫尽人间不平的骑士便显得那么滑稽而又那么伟大。一方面，他向往自由，拥有骑士一样除暴安良、劫富济贫的愿望;一方面他又是一个幻想家，幻想着用早已逝去的骑士风尚去帮助别人，也因此而闹出许多笑话。在我们看了，唐吉柯德也许是个平庸的、荒.唐可笑、甚至愚蠢的人，但他的忠诚、英勇，他不顾一切困难行侠仗义、为民服务的高尚行为，使他变得伟大。这种为民除害、行侠仗义的“骑士风尚”是我们每个人都很少具备的，却展示在了一个“疯子”身上。
骑士早已流逝在历史的长河中，谦卑、荣誉、牺牲、怜悯、诚实、公正的骑士风尚也在漫漫的时光里飘逝。这是一个时代的胜利还是悲哀?
篇9：唐吉坷德读后感作文
在最近几天翻阅了西班牙文艺复兴时期最杰出的现实主义小说家塞万提斯写的代表作《堂吉诃德》，感受深刻。下面是《堂吉诃德》的大概内容和我读后的一些感想。
作品主人公堂吉诃德是一个不朽的典型人物。书中写着，这个瘦削的、面带愁容的穷乡绅，由于爱读骑士文学，入了迷，竟然骑上一匹瘦弱的老马驽骍难得，找到了一柄生了锈的长矛，戴着破了洞的头盔，要去游侠，除强扶弱，为人民打抱不平。他雇了附近的农民桑丘·潘沙做侍从，骑了驴儿跟在后面。堂吉诃德又把邻村的一个挤奶姑娘想像为他的女恩主，给她取了名字叫杜尔西内娅·台尔·托波索。于是他以一个未受正式封号的骑士身份出去找寻冒险事业，他完全失掉对现实的感觉而沉入了漫无边际的幻想中，唯心地对待一切，处理一切，因此一路闯了许多祸，吃了许多亏，闹了许多笑话，然而一直执迷不悟。他把乡村客店当做城堡，把老板当做寨主，硬要老板封他为骑士。店老板乐得捉弄他一番，拿记马料账的本子当《圣经》，用堂吉诃德的刀背在他肩膀上着实打了两下，然后叫一个补鞋匠的女儿替他挂刀。受了封的骑士堂·吉诃德走出客店把旋转的风车当做巨人，冲上去和它大战一场，弄得遍体鳞伤。
作者以犀利的讽刺笔锋对西班牙的上层统治阶级进行了无情的鞭挞和嘲讽，对人民的苦难寄予了深切的同情。小说揭露了西班牙统治阶级外强中干的本质和彬彬有礼的外表下掩盖着的阴险、凶残的本性。小说中写到官僚们贪污纳贿，买卖黑权，卖官鬻爵的社会现象，好大喜功的国王疯狂的军事侵略，几千名无辜士兵，尽成炮灰。在面临重重危机的情况下，统治阶级以挑起宗教冲突或民族矛盾来摆脱困境，劳动人民被逼迫生活不下去了，只好铤而走险起来反抗。作者真实的反映了官逼民反的真情。
主人公堂吉诃德这个人物的性格具有两重性：一方面他是神智不清的，疯狂而可笑的，但又正是他代表着高度的道德原则、无畏的精神、英雄的行为、对正义的坚信以及对爱情的忠贞等等。他越疯疯癫癫，造成的灾难也越大，几乎谁碰上他都会遭到一场灾难，但他的优秀品德也越鲜明。桑丘·潘沙本来为当“总督”而追随堂吉诃德，后看无望，仍不舍离去也正为此。堂吉诃德是可笑的，但又始终是一个理想主义的化身。他对于被压迫者和弱小者寄予无限的同情。从许多章节中，我们都可以找到他以热情的语言歌颂自由，反对人压迫人、人奴役人。也正是通过这一典型，塞万提斯怀着悲哀的心情宣告了信仰主义的终结。这一点恰恰反映了文艺复兴时期旧的信仰解体、新的信仰尚未提出的信仰断裂时期的社会心态。
在当时黑暗腐朽、贫富悬殊的社会里，作者为我们塑造了一个“不畏强暴，不恤丧身”、立志扫尽人间不平的堂吉诃德。小说中的主人翁生活在资本主义兴起时期，充满着崇高的理想主义精神，总幻想扫除一切社会不平，这就与客观现实造成了冲突，这一冲突既具有喜剧性又具有悲剧性。
篇10：唐吉坷德读后感经典感悟
《堂吉诃德》是一部经典的讽刺喜剧小说。是塞万提斯的经典之作。
作品主人公堂吉诃德是一个不朽的典型人物。这个瘦削的小贵族，由于读骑士文学入了迷，竟骑上一匹老马，找了一柄生了锈的长矛，戴着破了洞的头盔，他雇了农民桑丘·潘沙骑了驴儿跟在后面做侍从，要去游侠，锄强扶弱，为人民打抱不平。堂吉诃德把邻村的一个挤奶姑娘想像为他的女恩主，托波索之达辛尼娅。他完全失掉对现实的感觉，沉入了漫无边际的幻想中，个性的对待一切。因此一路闯了许多祸，吃了许多亏，闹了许多笑话，然而一向执迷不悟，第一卷最后被人打成重伤，他的朋友想了许多办法才把他弄回家去。在第二卷中，他还不安生，继续去冒险，又吃了许多苦头，弄得一身病。直到他死前才悔悟他糟糕的一生。
主人公堂吉诃德有明显的性格特点：当他沉浸在骑士文学里的时候，他是有着高度道德原则的正义骑士。而他的仆人桑丘·潘沙也是一个特点鲜明的人物：比较起堂吉诃德疯狂幻想，他更加现实。比较起堂吉诃德丰富的学识，他知识十分贫乏。比较起堂吉诃德又瘦又高精干身材，他只是又矮又胖的圆滚体型。桑丘·潘沙和堂吉诃德其他事情上能够说是完全相反的两个人，但是在品质上，他们都是鲜亮、纯洁的白色，都有着各种各样的优良品质。
最开始时只是认为《堂吉诃德》这本书只是很滑稽罢了，但是真正看过之后，才发现其中的讽刺的意味，只有主人公在看小说入迷时，才会体现出人身上的正直、善良。多么讽刺啊，在疯狂的、神志不清的精神世界，主人公却展现出了人身上真正的良好品质：无畏、正直、善良……但是也正是这样疯狂地时刻，越是遇到灾难、挫折，堂吉诃德和他的仆人越是愈挫愈勇，他们身上的优秀品质也就越显鲜明。
堂吉诃德能够说一生都沉迷于骑士小说，在他沉迷于小说的时候，他就像是一个真正的骑士，他的品质闪烁着耀眼的光芒，直到他死前。看起来似乎堂吉诃德的沉迷使他办了许多“个性的事”，当我们在旁边感慨：“千万不好干什么太入迷!”时，难道我们没有个性入迷过一些事吗?当我们看书入迷时，会随书上情节的起伏而惊心肉跳、激动不已;当我们玩电脑入迷时，会两眼发直时刻观念完全消失;当我们工作学习入迷时，会不听不闻，专心致志……看似我们没有入迷或是说没入迷那么深，其实在我们生活中也会为感兴趣的东西沉迷不能自拔，我们都曾有堂吉诃德时刻。
雨果曾说过：“塞万提斯的创作是如此地巧妙，可谓天衣无缝;主角与桑丘，骑着各自的牲口，浑然一体，可笑又可悲，感人至极……”《堂吉诃德》不愧为一部经典之作。
篇11：唐吉坷德读后感经典感悟
《堂吉诃德》问世三百多年以来，经受了时刻的考验，堂吉诃德的名字在不一样的历史年代，在不一样的国家都流传着。堂吉诃德的名字已经变成了脱离实际、醉于幻想、主观主义的同义语。堂吉诃德生活在一个疯癫的世界里，他是清醒的。处在疯癫世界中，堂吉诃德不愿意像别人一样的疯癫。堂吉诃德的疯是对理性的反思，是对事物单一价值的怀疑。堂吉诃德看到世界的多层好处。
作品主人公堂吉诃德是一个不朽的典型人物。书中写着，这个瘦削的、面带愁容的穷乡绅，由于爱读骑士文学，入了迷，竟然骑上一匹瘦弱的老马驽骍难得，找到了一柄生了锈的长矛，戴着破了洞的头盔，要去游侠，除强扶弱，为人民打抱不平。他雇了附近的农民桑丘·潘沙做侍从，骑了驴儿跟在后面。堂吉诃德又把邻村的一个挤奶姑娘想像为他的女恩主，给她取了名字叫杜尔西内娅·台尔·托波索。于是他以一个未受正式封号的骑士身份出去找寻冒险事业，他完全失掉对现实的感觉而沉入了漫无边际的幻想中，唯心地对待一切，处理一切，因此一路闯了许多祸，吃了许多亏，闹了许多笑话，然而一向执迷不悟。他把乡村客店当做城堡，把老板当做寨主，硬要老板封他为骑士。店老板乐得捉弄他一番，拿记马料账的本子当《圣经》，用堂吉诃德的刀背在他肩膀上着实打了两下，然后叫一个补鞋匠的女儿替他挂刀。受了封的骑士堂·吉诃德走出客店把旋转的风车当做巨人，冲上去和它大战一场，弄得遍体鳞伤。他把羊群当做军队，冲上去厮杀，被牧童用石子打肿了脸面，打落了牙齿。桑丘·潘沙一再纠正他，他总不信。他又把一个理发匠当做武士，给予迎头痛击，把胜利取得的铜盆当做有名的曼布里诺头盔。他把一群罪犯当做受迫害的绅士，杀散了押役救了他们，要他们到村子里找女恩主去道谢，结果反被他们打成重伤。他的朋友想了许多办法才把他弄回家去。在第二卷中，他继续去冒险，又吃了许多苦头，弄得一身病。他的一位朋友参孙·卡拉斯科假装成武士把他打翻了，罚他停止游侠一年。堂吉诃德到死前才悔悟。
作者以犀利的讽刺笔锋对西班牙的上层统治阶级进行了无情的鞭挞和嘲讽，对人民的苦难寄予了深切的同情。小说揭露了西班牙统治阶级外强中干的本质和彬彬有礼的外表下掩盖着的阴险、凶残的本性。小说中写到官僚们贪污纳贿，买卖黑权，卖官鬻爵的社会现象，好大喜功的国王疯狂的军事侵略，几千名无辜士兵，尽成炮灰。在面临重重危机的状况下，统治阶级以挑起宗教冲突或民族矛盾来摆脱困境，劳动人民被逼迫生活不下去了，只好铤而走险起来反抗。作者真实的反映了官逼民反的真情。
篇12：《唐吉坷德》读书心得
唐吉坷德，一个沉迷于其实小说的穷乡绅，他有一个自认为伟大的梦想：成为一位勇敢的游侠骑士，披着盔甲，骑着战马走遍世界，行侠仗义、铲奸除恶、劫富济贫，救助所有深陷不幸境地的人，以骑士精神作为他最高的信仰。为了将自己的梦想付诸行动，他以利相诱，居然说动了邻居桑丘作他的奴仆。就这样，一个疯子和一个傻子开始了他们的骑士冒险旅程。唐吉诃德也许是对骑士传奇的极度狂热，以致走火入魔，一直处在疯狂的梦幻之中。站在现代医学的角度来看，他就是个典型的重度的狂想症患者，以致可以把一群羊想象成一支军队，把一架架风车当成可以助他建功立业的巨人。也许唐吉诃德的行为在我们读者的眼中是多么的荒谬，多么的可笑。然而我以为我们并不能因此去嘲讽他。我们可以说他无知，但不可以说他无聊，至少他所做的一切都是出于自己内心的冲动和对梦想的实践。我想一个拥有梦想并沉溺于其中的人是幸福的。梦想可以让自己体会到生命的价值。唐吉诃德的这个骑士梦，让他每一天都充满了力量，充满了希望，尽管他已经是一个瘦骨嶙峋的老头了。当然我们可以说，他——唐吉诃德的梦想是荒谬的，他的实践是盲目的。但我们面对自己真实的梦想时，却又能否下决心去实践呢。当唐吉诃德把羊群当成军队，把贵妇的车队当做被强盗劫持时，他面对自己的敌人(事实上他很认真的把羊群当成了军队，把车队当成了强盗，而非我们眼中的羊群和军队)丝毫没有一丝惧色，仍然义无反顾，拔刀相助。其实我们应该明白我们自己也许并没有唐吉诃德的天真和勇气。当我们现代人不再需要唐吉诃德那样英雄式的任务是，他就被我们抛弃在书堆与网络的深处，翻阅也是偶尔一刻。然而，当唐吉诃德手持着长矛冲向他心中的魔鬼——风车时，我们是否会感到一种莫名的缺失呢?或许是梦想，或许是正义，或许是勇气。亦或仅仅是一点点的天真而已。
最近两天翻阅了西班牙文艺复兴时期最杰出的现实主义小说家塞万提斯写的代表作《堂吉诃德》，感受深刻。
篇13：《唐吉坷德》读书心得
作者以犀利的讽刺笔锋对西班牙的上层统治阶级进行了无情的鞭挞和嘲讽，对人民的苦难寄予了深切的同情。小说揭露了西班牙统治阶级外强中干的本质和彬彬有礼的外表下掩盖着的阴险、凶残的本性。小说中写到官僚们贪污纳贿，买卖黑权，卖官鬻爵的社会现象，好大喜功的国王疯狂的军事侵略，几千名无辜士兵，尽成炮灰。在面临重重危机的情况下，统治阶级以挑起宗教冲突或民-族-矛-盾来摆脱困境，劳动人民被-逼迫生活不下去了，只好铤而走险起来反抗。作者真实的反映了官逼民反的真情。
在当时黑暗腐朽、贫富悬殊的社会里，作者为我们塑造了一个“不畏强暴，不恤丧身”、立志扫尽人间不平的堂吉诃德。小说中的主人翁生活在资本主义兴起时期，充满着崇高的理想主义精神，总幻想扫除一切社会不平，这就与客观现实造成了冲突，这一冲突既具有喜剧性又具有悲剧性。这个犯了时代错误的堂吉诃德却要在现实生活中恢复过了时的骑士精神，因而使得他成了一个夸张的、滑稽的、喜剧性的角色。但是作者在种.种场合中，反复突出他醉心铲除人间罪恶的这一特点，从而展示出他性格中的高贵品质，即为了追求正义、理想而置身危险于不顾，愿为社会而不惜牺牲自已的生命。因此与单纯公务员之家的喜剧性角色不同，他又是一个带有悲剧因素的人物，一个有着崇高精神境界的“疯子”。
只要不提骑士道，堂吉诃德的谈吐应答都十分高明，是一个学识渊博的学者，他的见解高于周围的人，他对社会的批评，对战争、法律、道德、文学艺术的看法具有远见卓识，闪耀着人文主义的思想光辉。他追求的理想社会是“不懂得什么叫做‘我的’、‘你的’”的“黄金国士”。他心目中的游侠骑士是一个无所不知、无所不能的全才，还要具有勇敢、胆大等各种美德。这样的人正是文艺复兴时期人文主义作家心目中的理想人物。堂吉诃德同情受侮辱受压迫的妇女，热情地支持追求个性解放的青年男女。
堂吉诃德清醒时是一个学识渊博的智者，糊涂时又是一个乱冲乱杀的疯子。他时而清醒，时而糊涂，这些极端矛盾的现象集中在他一个人身上，就构成了他的复杂、丰富、多方面的性格。作者虽然嘲笑骑士制度，却又赞美理想化的骑士精神;痛斥种.种罪恶现象，但又把许多社会问题归结到抽象的道德上去。这正是作者塞万提斯的人文主义理想与西班牙社会现实的矛盾的反映，也是人文主义弱点的反映。
《堂吉诃德》问世三百多年以来，经受了时间的考验，堂吉诃德的名字在不同的历史年代，在不同的国家都流传着。堂吉诃德的名字已经变成了脱离实际、醉于幻想、主观主义的同义语。
篇14：《唐吉坷德》读后感想
初看《堂吉诃德》，我认为它只是一部滑稽可笑的庸俗之作，主人公神经质的“勇敢精神”在书中表现得淋漓尽致，让人越发看不起他。但是细细品味，又觉得书中蕴涵了一种道理,人们的最基本的本质就是为了自己的目标不顾一切地去实现它。在实现的过程中，那位瘦骨嶙峋像根高梁杆儿似的游侠骑士，那位奇想联翩的绅士，时刻体现出他正直、善良的本性，这是人类最崇高的精神，因为过于单纯了，才闹出许多笑话。书中的主人公原本名叫吉哈纳，年过五旬，是一位绅士，虽说是地位显赫，但家境却也不宽裕。由于生活的清闲，这位绅士爱上了骑士小说，而且已经走火入魔，到了手不释卷，废寝忘食的地步。别人读小说，都只当消遣，对小说的情节多持笑料态度，而吉哈纳绅士则截然不同，他对骑士小说中的的荒唐故事深信不疑，对小说中的骑士佩服得五体投地。渐渐地，他失去了理性，想入非非要去做个游侠骑士，全副武装，漫游世界，去克服一切的困难和险阻，消灭一切邪恶的，残暴的力量，锄强扶弱，见义勇为，名留千古。于是，他从老屋里找到了一件锈迹斑斑的祖传的一套盔甲，并异想天开地用硬纸做了一个面盔。可惜不太结实，他没办法，只好用铁皮条重新做了一个，这才将这面盔的事情算是完成了，接着，他又找来一匹老马，然后美其名曰驽马难得，趁着给马取名的东风，他又给自己取了个骑士般的名字，唐吉诃德。然后又无比荒唐地请一个客栈老板为他受了封，就这样，他开始了他的游侠骑士之旅。
堂吉诃德的骑士之旅可谓是滑稽透顶了，把风车当成巨人，把美丽的农家女当成公主，把一家普通的小客店当做被实施了魔法的堡垒。第一次出行被人打得动弹不得，被驮在驴背上回到村里;第二次出行最终以被人装在木牢里带回村里告终;第三次出行在被同村学士装扮的骑士打败后郁郁寡欢地重回故里，直到最终一病不起。
如果说堂吉诃德的存在于他本身是一出悲剧，那么堂吉诃德临终前的清醒则是对于我们所有人的悲哀。“去年的雀巢，今年没有鸟。我过去是疯子，如今头脑已经清醒;我曾经是台曼拉的唐吉诃德;如今，只是好人阿隆索.吉哈纳。但愿我的悔悟和真诚能够换回诸位从前对我的尊重。……”唐吉诃德的这番话出现在他生命的终点似是所谓的清醒却更像是他对现实的一种妥协，这其中包含了一切的辛酸与凄凉，讽刺与无奈。当唐吉诃德的最后时刻终于到来时，他遗嘱的公证人刚好在场，他说，从未在任何一部骑士小说中看到过任何一位游侠骑士能像唐吉诃德那样安祥而平静地死在自己的卧榻之上。然而事实上，他却是一对矛盾中极大的一个受难者，不平的冤魂。
塞万提斯在《堂吉诃德》中一方面揭露批判社会的丑恶现象，一方面赞扬除暴安良、惩恶扬善、扶贫济弱等优良品德，歌颂了黄金世纪式的社会理想目标。所有这些，都是人类共同的感情，它可以穿越时空，对每个时代，每个民族，都具有现实感。
我个人在觉得堂吉诃德在滑稽之余，上文所体的追求梦想的精神，也的确是蕴涵在他的内心当中。对唐吉诃德这个看法，在嘲笑之外却也带着一种淡淡的敬佩。毕竟再经受了重重挫折之后还能为了自己的理想不懈奋斗的人的确是百里挑一的。这种精神，唐吉诃德如果运用得体，不去追寻什么骑士道，而去专注于其他的事业，我们也很难否定他不是一个成功人士。为此，笑过之后，却也为他深深的惋惜。
本书中一些所谓的`配角也给留下了很深的印象。如浪子回头的费兰多。费兰多故事本可以诉说一下，但在这里为了节省篇幅，也就不再提及了。还有善良聪明的神父。高明睿智的参孙学士。以及同样傻但对主人忠诚的骑士侍从桑丘，桑丘算得上是本是中的第二大可怜人了，被堂吉诃德的“花言巧语”骗得了桑丘的信任。使得桑丘答应做了唐吉诃德的侍从。从那以来我们的桑丘就没少受苦，在客店里被人用毯子包起来扔来扔去的戏弄，又被大家一起把他蒙在鼓里把他当作一个笑料，但是桑丘却以惊人的毅力为了自己根本不可能得到的所谓堂吉诃德口中的“海岛总督”而坚持着。就凭这份坚毅，我们不得不对这个小丑角色投去钦佩的一瞥。桑丘直到最后也被蒙在众人设计好的圈套里。他虽如愿以偿地当上了海岛的总督(实际上是一个小镇)，但自始至终，因为唐吉诃德给他开的骑士玩笑而被迫去做做一件件的荒唐事。
【看《唐吉坷德》名著的精选观后感】相关文章：
文档为doc格式
