当前位置：首页 > 范文大全 > 实用文>考研官方范文

考研官方范文

2023-05-08 08:19:12 收藏本文下载本文

“Kilin”通过精心收集，向本站投稿了18篇考研官方范文，下面就是小编给大家分享的考研官方范文，希望大家喜欢!

考研官方范文

篇1：官方推荐考研日语学习心得

刘苏曼老师，很高兴在和你分享了考研被录取的好消息后，还可以和大家分享我的一点经验，对于从来没有一点日语基础的我选择了新东方成就我梦想的地方，我想这是我考研成功的第一步，二外考试对于英语专业的考生是至关重要的，因为专业英语的水平在短期内无法有突破性的进展。在去北京之前，我心里有过忐忑、怀疑、退缩、放弃，我很害怕自己不能在两期的日语集训下得到长足的进步，因为其他与我一起准备考研的同学他们已经学习了一年的日语，而事实证明，世上无难事，只怕有心人，只要内心有这个信念，那么不管多么困难的槛都可以跨越。只有敢于面对眼前的困难，勇于挑战自己，才能超越自己。

还记得当初积累单词时的苦恼，即使再头痛也要坚持背诵，可是效果却不尽人意。老师就让我们学习日语歌，在轻松愉悦的环境下就可以记忆很多个单词，一直到现在我还记得这首歌，时不时的还会哼唱，这是我学习的第一首日语歌，兴趣是最好的老师。回来之后我也经常听老师给我传送的很多日语歌，并对其中我感兴趣的歌词进行摘抄和背诵，不知不觉就积累了很多单词。当同学们问我为什么能在这么短的时间把日语学好，当他们看到我的电脑里都是日语歌和日剧，他们就说没想到你学日语这么下劲。看日剧也是个不错的选择，可以消遣也可以学到标准的发音和地道的表达，还记得我们看的第一部电视剧“正义的伙伴”，这是大家在疲惫的学习后的一杯午后绿茶，不知不觉的驱走了疲惫，重新回到充满战斗力的学习状态。学习方式方法很多，不仅仅限于从课本上学习，它在我们身边的每个角落，只要你有心，处处无不闪烁着学习的火花！重复是语言学习的最好办法，一个单词和句型在多次使用后就不会忘了，我想每个人对于怎么说早上好和晚安肯定都很熟悉，因为这是日常生活中经常会说的，一天要和不同的人说同一句话，所以日语不应该只是在脑海里记忆，而是变成一种生活态度，一种无时无刻不在使用的生活工具，一句简单的问候会让你的生活变得很充实，因为回复你的是无数的真诚的笑脸。还记得当初我们很生硬的用日语和老师打招呼，心中忐忑不安是不言而喻的，但却很想说出来，一说出来就感觉自己又跨越了一小步，慢慢的积累就可以厚积而薄发。时间是最好的老师，它会帮助那些真正珍惜它的人实现梦想，

备考资料

以前的我并不是很喜欢发出声音来读书，或许是羞于读出口吧，又害怕自己会出错，读出来的不好听，不得不说这是缺乏自信的表现，每个人都不是生来就很优秀的，都是通过后天的努力和汗水才能使梦想的光芒得到实现，发声朗读是种很美妙的体验，它可以让心灵得到升华和净化，无声无息的改变你的心态，语感也会得到改善。拥有一个专业的日语电子词典会是很好的帮手，每次对于文章里的新单词都会很纠结，这时候不要急也不要有挫败感，其实新东西总是多于你掌握的知识，因为时代在进步，那么知识也会不停地更新，所以学习的动力永远都是存在的，要不厌其烦的一遍一遍的查看，哪怕这个单词你刚刚查过，只要现在忘记了就还是没有掌握，直到下次看到这个单词你已经能读出来明白什么意思才算是掌握了。日复一日的巩固自己所学到的新知识，在遇到同样的问题时提醒自己不能犯下同样的错误。语法知识我一直都是比较重视的，我很享受在一步一步的挑战自己的水平极限，一个复杂的句子在被多次背诵后，能够很清晰的呈现在脑海里，这也是对个人记忆力的挑战，必须要把每个知识点，每个单词和每个搭配都要弄清楚，前面的基础能否打好，与后面的学习有密切联系，切忌心急，学习语言本身就是个慢慢积累的过程，老师授予我们的是学习的方法，而真正可以提升水平的重要因素是坚持不懈的积累，持之以恒的努力、再努力！

我想学习的过程中总会有累的时候，总会有想放弃的时候，这时候亲人的重托、朋友的企望到处都是，他们可以促使你重新点燃欲望之火，给你的学习增添无穷无尽的动力。很感谢新东方所给予我的财富，才能让我在一路上砍荆棘破门槛，也感谢苏曼老师一路对我的的成长见证，能够与你结缘是我的福分，我会更努力的给你带去各种好消息，当然也希望老师能够梦想成真哦，你的努力我也一直铭记在心，更会把你当做榜样去学习。我会坚持把日语继续学习下去的，日后，日语学习将会成为我人生路上的必不可少的一种学习自觉，让我的生活充满阳光、充满幸福！

篇2：官方推荐四川大学工商管理考研经验

四川大学工商管理考研经验分享

作为一个跨专业的考生，能够成功考上自己心仪的专业是一件非常自豪的事，今天我也很想和大家分享一下我的经验，也许这对于正在迷茫的跨专业考生有所帮助，我本科专业是日语，报考专业是企业管理，考研成绩412分，届第2名，对于我考研最大阻碍是数学和专业课。

数学是一门拉分很厉害的学科，考得好的能考140多，考得差的也有很多，首先我想说一下资料选择问题：“资料不在多，在于精，题不在多，在于透”。我自学数学是从教材开始的，由于数学是零基础，在教材上花了整整三个月，把所以的概念、公式都摘录下来，没事时就反复的推导，这期间是很煎熬的，因为周围同学那时都开始做权威的复习全书了，但是我一直按照自己的计划走，熬到最后就会看到胜利的曙光.

我一共研究了三轮：做完一轮后自己总结一下，理出了考试的系统知识，第二轮也把所有题都做了一遍，第三轮重点看错题，很多人复习数学时一审题觉得自己懂了就不去做了，这是最大的忌讳，再简单的题一定要做效果才好，而且能加深印象，在做题时就锻炼了思维与总结的方法，

备考资料

二战考研经验分享

首先，我想说的是，如果不是对梦想有着强烈的渴望，如果不是对未来有着坚强的信念，如果不是有着强大的内心承受能力，如果不是有着过人的勇气和胆量，那么他是不会选择参加第二次乃至第三次考研，

其次:即使在整个备考过程中我们承受着比一战考生们更多的压力--父母的焦虑，周遭的嘲弄，关于爱情的无奈，对于工作的抉择，凡此种种都无一不是压在我们肩上的重担，但是请相信风雨之后总能见彩虹，不经一番寒彻骨，哪得梅花扑鼻香，只要跨过了这道坎，那么一个美丽而宽广的舞台在等待着你。.

你憧憬中的研究生生活在向你招手，真真是海阔凭鱼跃，天空任鸟飞。我报考专业是企业管理，考研成绩404分，2011届第六名。我第一次考研失败在很大程度上输在了专业课上，所以第二次在痛定思痛的基础上十分重视专业课的复习。

篇3：官方推荐东南大学工商管理专业考研经验

今年备战东南大学工商管理考研的人，主要谈下工商管理的考研经验，说法更多的是考研人士当时复习遇到的状况和心理想法，希望看过后能从中得到一些帮助或启示，

年总共有151万人参加考试，最后录取不超过50万人，也就是说大概三个就要淘汰两个，所以竞争还是非常激烈的，请注意，这只是平均说来，其实真正淘汰概率比这个大多了，因为很多人考的都是名校，竞争非常激烈，有些学校是30-40个中录取一个，甚至更高的有上百人中只录取一两个，所以说要调节好心态了，大家不要太担心考研，只要认真复习，就会有所成功。

很多师弟师妹都会问怎么样去制定一个好的复习计划，就我个人来说，我是作过很多计划的，但是总是一开始会认认真真的执行，后来就基本不执行，计划也就形同虚设了，我个人是比较喜欢随性的做事情的，就是想到做什么就做什么，想看什么书就看什么书，而不给自己规定的过多过死，但是不做计划有时候做事就没条理，

备考资料

管理学上有一个滚动计划法，建议大家参考一下这个方法给自己的考研做个好的计划，根据计划的执行情况和环境变化情况定期地修正自己的计划，使自己考研的长期，中期，短期计划能很好地衔接起来。

心态上：

要考研那就是长时间枯燥，折磨般的准备，大量的精力物力的投入不是随便下定决心就下定的。因此决定是否考研与为什么考研就是最开始的任务。同学可以把如果考研自己会怎么样，不考研会怎么样，考研的优势劣势都列出来，类似于swot分析法。一定要用笔写出来，实实在在写在纸上比自己脑袋理想的会清晰明了的多。

我貌似根本没有出现过其他人说的那种工作考研两手准备的念头，这个时候不是狡兔三窟的时候。各位同学若决定考研，那么可以试着暗示自己别人找工作很苦，经常碰壁，就算找到了也是不对口的；自己找工作会因为学历太低而没有企业要你。诸如此类的假设暗示，潜移默化的会让自己考研的信心坚定下来，不再做无谓的徘徊。

一提起考研当事人都或多或少会有“必须吃苦，艰苦奋斗”的思想，觉得必须每秒都努力的坐在图书馆看书，但偶尔的情绪波动与理想的斗志场景的差距就会让自己觉的不行了的情绪。

篇4：考研专业课复习选用官方指定教材

考研专业课复习选用官方指定教材

专业课的内容繁多，所以采用有效的复习方法也显得尤为重要。对于专业课复习，考生首先要合理分配时间、利用时间。考研辅导专家提醒考生，对于准备考研的学生来说，经过十几年的学习，应该有了一套自己的学习方法，通常都是把需要背记的内容放在每天精力最旺盛的时候，且每门持续背诵的时间不能安排得过长。同时利用好每一段时间，做到通过每一时段的学习都能真正获得效果。

选用官方指定教材

复习的教材有很多，模拟到各种周边资料层出不穷，但真正有用的资料却需要你用心“淘”。小编提醒考生，现在复习时间紧凑，如果你无暇分身去寻找隐藏起来的复习资料，那么就把官方指定的教材认真浏览一遍，相信效果一定不会比其他任何资料的效果差。现在有很多院校采用自主命题，这也就意味着出题者很可能是该校该专业的老师，老师们在出题时肯定会首先参照本专业所选用的教材，毕竟这是你在研究生期间将要用到的'东西，老师们当然想看看你对这个专业了解有多少，所以目标院校指定的教材通常就是最有用最可靠的教材，大家也就不必舍近求远了。

巧用历年真题

往年的专业课试题是非常重要的复习参考资料。历年真题集中体现了该专业学科的专业基础知识、该专业导师群关注的研究方向。通过纵向比较本专业历年的专业课试题，横向比较不同院系相同专业的历年专业课试题，考研辅导专家提醒考生，考生对专业课考试的试卷题型、考查范围和重点内容等会有较为详细的了解。当然，要选用本专业综合实力最强的招生院系的历年专业课真题。专业课的许多知识都要以记忆为基础，而记忆方法的优劣则影响到专业课的备考。对于专业课知识的复习，“阅读法”和“位置法”则是两种行之有效的方法。“阅读法”即把需要记忆的内容当作一篇故事，就像看故事一样看他几遍，记住大概的“情节”，每次重复看时就补上上次没记住或已经忘记的部分。这样经常看就会慢慢记住了，而且记得很全面。

篇5：官方道歉信

6月15日，中国男子足球队在与泰国男子足球队的热身赛中以1：5失利，引起了广大球迷和群众的强烈不满。从这场比赛的过程和结果看，是不正常的、不可接受的，完全没有体现中国国家队应有的精神风貌和水平。这场比赛的失利，并不仅仅是技战术层面的原因，更是思想、精神、意志、队伍管理方面的原因。赛后，国家体育总局领导对国家队本场比赛的表现提出了严厉批评，也对中国足协的工作提出了严厉的批评。

本场比赛后，国家队、国家队管理部、中国足协进行了认真总结和深刻反思。中国足协认为，这场比赛的大比分失利，原因是多方面的，但无论是教练、队员还是其他方面的客观原因，都不是中国足协推卸责任的理由，作为中国足球的管理机构，中国足协必须对本场比赛的失利承担最主要的责任。对于广大群众和领导的批评，中国足协诚恳接受并将认真整改。

足球是深受广大群众喜爱的项目，中国足球长期落后，令人痛心。近年来，在党和政府的`关怀下，在社会各界的支持下，在国家体育总局的正确领导下，足球反赌扫黑、治理整顿取得了积极成效，人们对于足球发展的信心逐步恢复，足球发展的气氛开始回暖。而中泰之战的耻辱性失利，极大打击了广大球迷和群众的足球热情，对足球的健康发展带来极大的负面影响，也极大损害了中国体育的良好形象。在此，中国足协向热爱、支持足球事业的广大球迷、群众、赞助商、社会各界表示诚恳道歉！

中国足协决心汲取“6.15”的深刻教训，以此为鉴，加强中国足协队伍建设和制度建设，改进作风，提升素质，加强国家队管理和教育，激发运动队和全行业为国争光的政治责任感，为改变中国足球的落后面貌务实工作、努力奋斗。

篇6：官方邀请函

洛阳XXXXXX公司

×X年×月×日

这是商务礼仪活动邀请函的主体内容，标题除了文种“邀请函”、事由“××广告公司年终客户答谢会”字样外，还出现了活动主题标语“财富主角”；正文亦符合礼仪文书的行文要求，可谓是事务与礼仪的完美结合。

商务礼仪活动邀请函的回执则常采用表格的形式，将需要被邀请方填写的事项逐项列出。一般包括参会企业名称、参会人员姓名、性别、职务、民族习惯、参会要求(如参与某项专题活动)；被邀请方的联系人、联系电话、电子邮件地址等。礼仪活动组织部门的名称、联系人、联系电话、电子邮件地址、企业网址等。

篇7：官方道歉信相关

亲爱的xx总监：

我在公司工作了xx年多。首先感谢xx总监（xx乳业集团）对我个人工作和修养的来信，感谢他给我更好的.工作平台。但是在20xx学校牛奶的市场开发和销售过程中，个人工作不规范，给公司带来了不良影响。即使在经济管理方面，我们也不能很好地把握自己，存在一些大问题。我知道这些事件的发生给公司带来了不良影响，也影响了公司的声誉和形象。现在，我深刻地认识到，工作中的负面表现是由我的个人行为和我没有管理好自己造成的。我也深刻意识到事情的严重性和工作中的缺陷，给企业造成了其他负面影响。在此，我向X董事长道歉认错，在这方面，我恳请X董事长一定程度的原谅我！我也愿意接受公司对我个人的处罚。在我最近xx年的工作中，得到了公司同事的各种帮助，非常感谢公司同事。我在公司学到了很多东西，也学到了新的商业技能。无论我将来去哪里，做什么，这段经历都将是我宝贵的财富。我为自己在xx集团的工作经历感到骄傲！因为我个人原因，对公司造成了不良影响。如果公司给我请假，我没有怨言，离职后郑重向公司领导承诺：

1、离职后严格保守公司所有商业秘密；

2、离开公司，不会做任何公开损害公司企业形象的事情；

3、永远做一个感谢xx企业和x董事长的人，衷心祝愿xx集团事业蒸蒸日上！

此致

敬礼！

道歉人：xxx

日期：xxxx年xx月xx日

篇8：官方推荐在职联考考研高分经验：注重积累

首先考研生要全面的剖析自己，先确定考研的方向，了解自己对哪个方面感兴趣，对自己的能力，自己未来的出路要有清楚的认识。明白了这一点，才能随后确定所要报考的学校和专业然后再定下考研方向。如果你已经确定考试方向，就可以给自己列一个大体计划，并按照计划完成任务即可，

备考资料

其次20考研生靠积累也靠冲刺，复习一方面是靠平时的积累，另一方面也考复习时候的冲刺。就拿英语来说吧，作文和阅读占据了很大的分值，这也就意味着词汇量非常重要。很多同学都为背单词发愁，其实背单词也具有一定的技巧与方法。

大家可以通过做阅读来背单词，首先第一遍按照考试阅读理解的要求来做，第二遍要把不认识的单词，尤其是常用的不认识的单词亲自动手查一遍，这样记忆深刻。第三遍，运用自己查好的单词再读一遍文章，深入理解文章大意。这样既锻炼了自己的阅读能力，也很有兴趣的背了单词。中外文章在写作方式方法上存在差异，要始终站在作者的角度上去理解文章大意，回答问题。同时要灵活运用真题，重点做了近三年的真题。其它年份的真题当成是练兵，不做单词查阅等工作。最后的冲刺阶段可以试着做两套真题。看看自己的实力大概是多少分。冲刺阶段要学会合理安排答题顺序和时间，把自己把握大的分值高的部分先做，保证会做的不会因为没有时间而丢分。

篇9：考研政治争议多选题官方答案出来啦！

考研政治争议多选题官方答案出来啦！

随着考研政治阅卷慢慢落下帷幕，教育部阅卷官方答案已经揭晓！今年考研最具争议的两道题：多选17题和19题答案已经尘埃落定了。

以下是这两道题的详细情况：

17.显微摄影是一门使用照相机拍摄显微镜下一般用肉眼无法看清的标本的技术。肉眼中千篇一律的细沙，在显微镜下，却是“一沙一世界”。有的晶莹剔透像宝石，有的金黄酥脆像饼干。即使是司空见惯的柴米油盐，在显微镜下也会展现神奇而充满魅力的另一面。显微镜下的“一沙一世界”表明

A．任何事物都具有无限多样的属性

B．事物的本质随着人们认识的变化而改变

C．人们可以通过制造和使用工具日益深化对客观世界的认识

D．人们能够通过对个别事物的认识而达到对世界整体的把握

【答案】ACD

【解析】本题考查《马原》课程“唯物辩证法”等复合考点。事物的本质是事物的内在联系和根本性质，是相对稳定的，只有靠人的理性思维才能把握，但它并不随人们的认识变化而改变，所以B项说法错误，属于唯心主义的观点。唯物辩证法认为：世界是无限的，都具有无限多样的属性,故A入选。题干的最后一句“显微镜下的“一沙一世界”表明”中的“显微镜“，与D项的意思贴合；”一沙一世界“中的”沙“指个别事物，”一沙一世界“中的”世界“指世界的整体，与C项贴合。

19.马克思说：“一切现实的危机的最终原因始终是：群众贫穷和群众的消费受到限制，而与此相对立，资本主义生产却竭力发展生产力，好像只有社会的绝对的'消费能力才是生产力发展的界限。”这段论述表明

A.社会的绝对的消费能力导致了经济危机的发生

B.经济危机的发生根本上在于资本主义的基本矛盾

C.资本积累与无限扩大生产也是经济危机发生的原因

D.经济危机的发生与群众的贫穷及其消费能力受到限制有关

【答案】BCD

【解析】本题考查《马原》课程第五章之“资本主义经济危机的实质、根源、具体表现和周期性”考点。资本主义经济危机是生产相对过剩的危机。所谓相对过剩是指对人劳动人民有支付能力的需求来说，社会生产的商品显得过剩，而不是与劳动人民的实际需求相比的绝对过剩。因此A错误。资本主义经济危机爆发的根本原因是资本主义的基本矛盾，据此选B。这种矛盾表现在两个方面：其一，生产无限扩大的趋势与劳动人民有支付能力的需求相对缩小的矛盾，据此，CD选项正确；其二，个别企业内部生产的有组织性和整个社会生产的无政府状态之间。

篇10：官方兽医年终总结

在区畜牧兽医局和地方党委、政府的正确领导下，通过兽医站全体职工的共同努力，紧紧围绕畜牧兽医局年初下达的各项目标任务，突出重点，很抓落实，以示范带动为引领，全面推进全镇畜牧业整体发展，取得了一定的成绩，现总结如下：

一、指导思想

全站统一思想，使大家认识到，进一步转变服务观念，以群众满意为标尺，认真开展日常工作，推动全镇畜牧业持续健康发展；深入贯彻落实《食品安全法》、《农产品质量安全法》、《畜牧法》、《动物防疫法》、《饲料和饲料添加剂管理条例《兽药管理条例》等法律法规。

二、突出重点，切实完成各项工作

（一）切实抓好春防工作。我站把春防工作作为今年上半年年度工作的重中之重，同时分派技术精干人员，采取分片分社，责任到头，严格按照“村不漏组、组不漏户、户不漏畜、畜不漏针”的标准要求，建立了免疫档案等；确保了免疫密度和质量。

（二）抓好检疫及食品安全工作。加强检疫监管，严格落实产地检疫和屠宰检疫“四到位”，要求屠宰点的检疫员严格执行各项规章制度，准时到岗，按照检疫操作规程进行检疫，严格杜绝不合格肉品出场。上半年，全镇共实施产地检疫生猪1955头、禽类xx羽、屠宰检疫猪1864头，全镇共收检疫费13943元。同时加强质量检验检测，认真完成饲料、兽药、养殖及屠宰环节“瘦肉精”等各项质量安全监测任务，扩大抽查覆盖面，提高检测频次和密度，其中共用“瘦肉精”检测卡221张。

（三）切实开展惠民工程。

一是加强宣传。通过村社干部，以会代训等形式，切实宣传好中央财政实施能繁母猪死亡保险、向规模化发展畜牧业以及退耕还林后续产业化发展等惠民工程，鼓励调动农民的积极性；

二是严格执行惠民工程。及时落实相关惠民工程的补贴等。

三、狠抓标准化、规模化生产发展

为大力倡导鼓励标准化、规模化养殖发展要求，今年我站在年初推进了实施方案，使得全镇生猪养殖大户有11户、养牛大户有2户、养羊大户xx户、养鹅大户6户、1个养鹅基地、养鸡大户2户。

四、存在的.不足。

1、是农户对养殖积极性不高，市场价格不稳定、发展不平衡。

2、是防检管理工作有待于加强，由于交通条件和现有体制，导致防检管理工作难度不断增大。

五、下半年的工作打算：

通过半年深入开展群众路线教育实践活动，全站人员的学习意识得到了进一步加强，服务宗旨意识进一步增强，工作的自觉性有了很大的提高。纵观半年的工作，虽然取得了一定成效，但还存在着许多不足，同上级的要求还有差距，我们将以此为契机，紧紧围绕全镇经济发展的大局，认真做好服务工作，努力提高工作效率，为群众提供优质、高效、及时的服务，为全镇的畜牧业增效、农民增收作出新的贡献。

篇11：UGNX6.0官方教程

UG NX 6是Unigraphics Solutions公司（简称UGS）提供的集CAD/CAE/CAM集成系统的最新版本，它在UG NX5的基础上做了许多改进，为当今世界最先进的计算机辅助设计、分析和制作软件之一。此软件集建模、制图、加工、结构分析、运动分析和装配等功能于一体，广泛应用与航天、航空、汽车、造船等领域，显著地提高了相关工业的生产率。本UGNX6.0官方教程主要介绍UG NX 6软件的基础知识及基本操作等。

UG软件作为UGS公司的旗舰产品，是当今最流行的CAD/CAE/CAM一体化软件，为用户提供了最先进的集成技术和一流实践经验的解决方案，能够把任何产品的构思付诸实际，

UG NX6是UG系列软件的最新版本，7月发布。其不仅具有UG以前版本的强大功能，而且用户界面更加灵活。并由多个应用模块组成，使用这些模块，可以实现工程设计、绘图、装配、辅助制造和分析一体化。随着版本的不断更新和功能的不断补充，使其向专业化和智能化不断迈进，例如机械布管、电器布线、航空钣金、车辆设计等。

第1章 UG NX6基础知识第2章 UG NX 6基本操作作第3章创建草图第4章曲线功能第5章实体建模第6章曲面建模第7章装配第8章工程制图基础第9章视图管理第10章工程图标注和符号第11章 UG建模实例—齿轮泵建模第12章 UG建模实例—油泵壳体的设计装配

篇12：实习总结(官方)

实习总结(官方) -实习学习总结

第一次实习，地点是人们平日里觉得甚是神秘的电视台。实习内容是编导，对于编导的这一说法觉得很是新鲜，日后才深刻体会，这个平常节目里被喊为小编或者是导演的工作，与生活是如此贴近。我所在的节目组《健康时间》，我所做过的工作有听同期、写稿子、录口播、剪片子、拍外景、跟后期。可以说一个编导该做的我都很努力地去学。在电视台里，如若不是外拍便是在3楼机房，刚开始的不熟悉，不仅是对工作还是对实习老师，因为觉得融不入工作的圈子，始终觉得自己是个工作以外的人，因此很少到19楼办公室。也因为“常驻”3楼机房，一连看了好几位老师编片，也几乎每位老师都教过我怎么编片。编片就是对拍摄素材进行剪辑，使之串联成播出的成片，这也是每位编导所要掌握的最基本技术。一开始看到陌生的机器，觉得无从下手，再加上每位老师编片时“绚烂”的.手法，不得不令我佩服，也暗暗思付什么时候才可以学会，什么时候才可以自己编片。看了好几位老师编片的过程，也聆听了他们的教诲，对于编片的步骤已然烂熟于胸，但当老师拿过两盘带子要我自己编编看的时候，依旧不知道从哪里下手。有一天，一位老师要我亲自剪片，而他在旁边告诉我剪片的步骤，这一次的实践将我所掌握的理论串了起来，一回生二回熟，我也算慢慢学会了片子的剪辑，到最后能够独立进行剪辑。想说，实践真的是检验真理的唯一标准，要想看看自己到底学会了什么，唯有实践。也只有真正去实践了，才知道自己还有哪些不足，还有哪些需要请教。可以说学会编片是我实习编导以来对自己最大的肯定。实习一个多月，可以说最最紧张，压力最大的是最后一个礼拜，为了自己的实习作品努力着。并非说前面的工作不上心，毕竟最后一期节目是自己担纲，各种细节自己把握，没有谁能够帮忙，有一种只许成功不许失败的悲壮。从前期准备到后期成片，我很高兴尽管很多时候是一个人走过，但周围还是有那么多人的鼓励。还记得在节目播出的那天，因为是晚上播出，所以白天大家都在赶片子的后期，连午餐都错过了。不会忘记成片出来那一刻的放松，终于，完成了。实习的经历是宝贵的。很高兴在实习结束的时候可以大声地说，我无愧于这一个月，我努力用最认真最负责的态度去面对每个老师交给我的任务。即使是最没技术含量的同期，我会也会在最快时间内完成，并且保证没有错误。有一位同在实习的同学告诉我，他说，他还蛮欣赏我的，因为我在面对工作时候的专注有超乎年龄的感觉，是其他实习生所不具备的。我不禁要将这种褒奖归功到中学时期的学生干部生涯。那时候身为学生会主席，很多任务必须高质量、高速度完成，也许如此，锻炼了我在工作上严谨、追求完美的态度。曾经很长一段时间以为，集中留给我的，不过是主席的虚名而已，于我而言并没有什么实质性的东西。现在终于明白，原来，一切尽在潜移默化中。

篇13：新GREIssue官方

Issue test 3

The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how those considerations shape your position.

The following sample issue response received a score of 6:

Passion is clearly necessary for a truly great idea to take hold among a people—passion either on the part of the original thinker, the audience, or ideally both. The claim that the most lucrative subject matter for inspiring great ideas is “commonplace things” may seem initially to be counterintuitive. After all, aren’t great ideas usually marked by their extraordinary character? While this is true, their extraordinary character is as often as not directly derived from their insight into things that had theretofore gone unquestioned. While great ideas certainly can arise through seemingly pure innovation... say, for example, Big Bang cosmology, which developed nearly all of its own scientific and philosophical precepts through its own process of formation, it is nevertheless equally true that such groundbreaking thought was, and is, still largely a reevaluation of previous assumptions to a radical degree... after all, the question of the ultimate nature of the universe, and man’s place in it, has been central to human thought since the dawn of time. Commonplace things are, additionally, necessary as material for the generation of “the best ideas” since certainly the success among an audience must be considered in evaluating the significance and quality of an idea.

The advent of Big Bang cosmology, which occured in rudimentary form almost immediately upon Edwin Hubble’s first observations at the Hooker telescope in California during the early 20th century, was the most significant advance in mankind’s understanding of the universe in over 400 years. The seemingly simple fact that everything in the universe, on the very large scale, is moving away from everything else in fact betrays nearly all of our scientific knowledge of the origins and mechanics of the universe. This slight, one might even say commonplace, distortion of tint on a handful of photographic plates carried with it the greatest challenge to Man’s general, often religiously reinforced, conception of the nature of the world to an extent not seen since the days of Galileo. Not even Charles Darwin’s theory, though it created more of a stir than Big Bang cosmology, had such shattering implications for our conceptions of the nature of our reality. Yet it is not significant because it introduced the question of the nature of what lies beyond Man’s grasp. A tremendous number of megalithic ruins, including the Pyramids both of Mexico and Egypt, Stonehenge, and others, indicate that this question has been foremost on humankind’s collective mind since time immemorial. Big Bang cosmology is so incredibly significant in this line of reasoning exactly because of the degree to which it changed the direction of this generally held, constantly pondered, and very ancient train of thought.

Additionally, there is a diachronic significance to the advent of Big Bang cosmology, which is that, disregarding limitations such as the quality of optical devices available and the state of theoretical math, it could have happened at any point in time. That is to say, all evidence points to roughly the same raw intellectual capacity for homo sapiens throughout our history, our progress has merely depended upon the degree of it that a person happens to inherit, a pace that has been increasing rapidly since the industrial revolution. Yet this discovery had to happen at a certain point in time or another—it cannot have been happening constantly or have never happened yet still be present—and this point in time does have its own significance. That significance is precisely the fact that the aforementioned advent must have occurred at precisely the point in time at which it truly could have occured—that is to say, it marks the point in our history when we had progressed sufficiently to begin examining, with remarkable substantiated acuity, the workings of the universe across distances that would take millions of human lifetimes to reach or to traverse. The point for the success of this advent must necessarily have been, additionally, the point at which the audience concerned was capable and prepared to accept such a radical line of reasoning.

Both factors, a radical, passionate interpretation of the commonplace and the preparedness to accept such an interpretation, are necessary for the formulation of a truly great idea. If the passion is absent from an inquiry by the thinker or by the bulk of an audience, the idea will die out if it comes to fruition at all. If the material is not sufficiently commonplace to be considered by an informed audience of sufficient size, the same two hazards exist. Given these two factors, the idea must still be found palatable and interesting by the audience if it is to hope to gain a foothold and eventually establish itself in a significant fashion.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 6:

This outstanding response presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the complexities of the issue by arguing that (1) great ideas develop from commonplace observations that are interpreted in a radical way; and (2) passion is required of both thinkers and the audience in order for great ideas to take hold.

The argument is based on an extended example (Big Bang cosmology) and has two parts. The first part defines “commonplace things” as universal questions (i.e., the quest to understand the cosmos is commonplace, though complex, because it is an ancient and universal question) and places Big Bang cosmology in context with the scientific breakthroughs of Galileo and the Pyramids of ancient Mexico and Egypt.

The second part explains Big Bang as the result of a convergence of factors: both thinkers and the audience must be ready to reevaluate “previous assumptions” and accept “radical, passionate interpretations.”

The argument’s careful line of reasoning is strengthened by appropriate transitions between paragraphs (“Additionally,” “Both factors, a radical, passionate interpretation of the commonplace and the preparedness to accept such an interpretation, are necessary for the formulation of a truly great idea,” etc.) and within paragraphs (“Not even Charles Darwin’s,” “Yet,” “that is to say,” etc.). Fluent and precise language—advent, rudimentary, diachronic, shattering implications, megalithic ruins—and effective sentence variety also characterize this response as outstanding. Finally, despite the presence of minor errors (overuse of comma and inconsistent use of ellipses in paragraph 1), this response demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English.

篇14：新GREIssue官方

The following sample issue response received a score of 5:

The statement above comes from the perspective that the best thinkers, inventors, and innovators are the way that they are because they explore passionately the interesting things around them. Yes, I would say that this is definitely true.I understand best the things that interest me, but it is only the things with which I am familiar with and understand in my surroundings. It would be difficult to take passionate interest in the things which I did not have available in my environment.

For example, let’s consider some “idea” people in history. The person who invented the basketball hoop, or the game of volleyball, or ice skates, all had interest in those things before they had their brilliant ideas. I do know that the inventor of the basketball hoop used to coach a basketball team of young boys, and they would throw the ball into a fruit basket that was nailed to the wall. Obviously, a basket has a bottom to it, and they would have to fish it out after every successful throw. So he had the brilliant idea of cutting out the bottom of the basket. It seems so simple to us now, but nobody had ever played basketball like that in his day.

The phrase, “commonplace things” can be rather misleading, I believe. I think every person has slightly different “commonplace things” in their environment depending on their interests, their financial status, and availability of items. What is commonplace for one person may never be known by another. I take passionate interest in things having to do with sewing using patterns, fabrics and threads. However, my mother and grandmother are excellent seamstresses and I had the availability of learning from them. It was a “commonplace thing” for me. I have had some wonderful ideas come out of my passion for this kind of art.

Orville and Wilbur Wright had a passionate interest in things having to do with flight, a rather ordinary thing for the sorts of birds who can fly with their wings, but certainly not people. If I had lived during the Wright brothers’ time, I would probably not have had the same passionate interest in figuring out how to make humans fly, because it is not something that I would have thought possible. But their dreams and visionary possibilities were much bigger than mine would have been at that time. They not only had a passionate interest but they were willing to experiment, to risk financial ruin and ridicule, and even put their lives on the line. So while it is true that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commplace things, there also has to be an element of daring to challenge “norms” and not being able to just accept things as they are. There has to be a desire to make things better and to improve on the present.

There also has to be the element of not being afraid of failure. Most ideas do inevitably fail. Einstein is viewed today as being one of the most brilliant thinkers and “idea” people in all of history. But nobody really talks about how many times his ideas failed. The number is quite amazing. Many people are afraid of failure, so even though they make take a passionate interest in something commonplace, and have some great ideas, they may never carry them through because of uncertainty that they would work. We must be willing to try!

So, yes, it is true that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things, because these are the things that we know, these are the things that we understand, and the things that we want to explore in even more depths. But there must be more elements involved than just taking interest in something. We must be willing to face risks of many kinds in order to separate the ideas that fail from the ones that will triumphantly succeed.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 5:

This strong response presents a well- considered analysis of the complexities of the issue by arguing that great ideas come, not only from a passionate interest in the commonplace, but also from great imagination and a willingness to succeed.

The logic of the response unfolds very smoothly: paragraph 3 explores the term “commonplace” and offers support for the prompt’s position; paragraphs 4 and 5 discuss the related issues of imagination, willingness to experiment, and overcoming failure. The examples are well chosen and generally well developed.

Paragraph 2 offers a relevant, though predictable, sports example (invention of basketball hoop) to examine how commonplace things/familiarity can spark great ideas. A personal example is used in paragraph 3 to further explore the definition of “commonplace” and illustrate how the term is relative to financial status and availability (though only the concept of availability is developed in this example). Paragraph 2 logically extends into paragraph 3, and the same connection is seen between paragraphs 4 and 5.

In paragraph 4 the Wright brothers are used to argue that great ideas also come from imagination and a willingness to experiment. The final example, in which Einstein is offered to illustrate the necessity of overcoming failure, is not as fully developed as the others. The respondent does not explain what failures Einstein endured or how he overcame them, which makes the example less compelling. Overall, the analysis demonstrated in the examples is “perceptive and clear,” but not “insightful and cogent” as required for a score of 6. While the response expresses ideas clearly, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety, it does not use language as fluently and precisely as would a typical 6. Occasional wordiness/ awkwardness could be avoided with more precise diction (e.g., “There also has to be the element of not being afraid of failure,” or “I have had some wonderful ideas come out of my passion for this kind of art”).

篇15：新GREIssue官方

The following sample issue response received a score of 3:

How do new knowledge came into being? Sometimes it stemed from exsiting knowledge. Sometimes it was born all out of sudden. Both ways seem work well. As I see through this question, I believe that what plays a key role in creating new ideas is a passionate interest.

Throughout history, a myriad of examples help prove the importance of interest. Edison, the greatest inventors in the world, possessed a sharp interest ever since his childhood. In his eyes, every common things were full of mysteries. It was his unique interest which helped him look into the machanism of things around therefore new iders came into his mind and, changed into conceret machines facilitating our lives. Another famous example is that of Newton. A riped apple from a tree fell onto his head one afternoon. For ordinary people, this kind of trivial instance would slip off their mind at once. However, Newton lost hisself in thought of the relation between objects. Finally he found gravitation and opened up a new era of physics.

On the other hand, without interest, the opportunity of great discoveries will pass by. Most people are experiencing ordinary lives everyday. Why don’t they come up with great ideas? Because interest is a state of skeptism, a state in which we do not stop to disclose the truth beneath a surface of commonplaces. Interest means the ability to explore the internal corelations. Therefore, with a passiontae interest, those commonplace things are no longer commonplace, and new ideas are created.

From what have been discussed above, we can see that interest serves as force to propell the exploration of unknowns, to perfect the structure of human knowledge, and to move towards the ultimate truth.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 3:

This limited response demonstrates some competence in its analysis and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed.

The response agrees with the prompt by arguing that a passionate interest allows people to see beyond the commonplace and create new ideas (paragraphs 1 and 3). However, the response is limited in presenting and developing this position.

In paragraph 2 the response offers two relevant but underdeveloped examples to illustrate the importance of interest in generating ideas.

The Edison example is not persuasive because its development is limited to generalities (“common things were full of mysteries...which helped him look into the machanism of things...therefore new iders came into his mind and, changed into conceret machines”). The response does not provide specific examples of the common “things” that interested Edison nor does it discuss any of Edison’s particular ideas. Thus, it does little to advance the response’s position. The Newton example is not penalized for historical inaccuracy. However, like the previous example, it is overly general and underdeveloped.

The response also contains an accumulation of language errors (in usage, word choice, and sentence structure) that often result in a lack of clarity. For instance, the rhetorical device used in paragraph 1 contains frequent errors that render it ineffective. The imprecise language use in the Newton example is particularly unsettling: “Newton lost hisself in thought of the relation between objects. Finally he found gravitation and opened up a new era of physics.” While these errors do not generally interfere with meaning, they constitute a lack of language control that precludes a score of 4.

篇16：新GREIssue官方

The following sample issue response received a score of 2:

The above statement reinforces my values and beliefs. I agree that the best ideas arises from a paasionate interest. I agree simply because a person must be able to personally relate to a thing in order to become passionate to the idea. The person behind the best ideas are passionate because the commonplace things have affected the person on a personally level or on a mutual level. The relationship between the commonplace thing and the best idea unites a passionate interest to the person who it has affected. A person must have a desire to build on their passion in order to follow through on his or her idea.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 2:

This response presents a seriously flawed analysis of the issue.

The response agrees with the prompt by arguing that a person must be able to relate to something in order to develop passion for it. (The connection between things one can “relate to” and “commonplace things” is implied.) The response also states that passion is necessary in order for a person to follow through on an idea. However, neither of these claims is supported with relevant reasons or examples.

Furthermore, flawed word choice and other language control problems make the reasoning hard to follow (particularly in sentences 4 and 5: “The person behind the best ideas are passionate because the commonplace things have affected the person on a personally level or on a mutual level. The relationship between the commonplace thing and the best idea unites a passionate interest to the person who it has affected.” In those sentences the respondent attempts to analyze the relationship between commonplace things, passion, and ideas). Nevertheless, this response is not a 1: the respondent does provide evidence of the ability to understand the issue and attempts to present a position on it.

The following sample issue response received a score of 1:

This topic can be found to be true in many different areas. The best ideas that people have come up with are usually founded be improving commonplace things. For example in order to improve the effiecency of writing the typewriter was invented, then following that the computer was invented.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 1:

This response presents a fundamentally deficient discussion of the issue.

The first sentence consists of generic language that can be applied to any prompt. Thus, it neither enhances nor detracts from the analysis. The remainder of the response consists of a statement in support of the prompt and a list of two examples (the typewriter and the computer). The examples offered are potentially relevant but completely undeveloped. Basic errors in usage and grammar are pervasive, but it is primarily the inability to develop an organized response that makes this response a 1.

篇17：新GREIssue官方

The following sample issue response received a score of 4:

In agreement with the statement, many great inventions have come from individuals interested in commonplace things. Out of simplicity arises great ideas, and I would consider commonplace things to be simplistic. However, it is hard to say that the “best” ideas arise from passion in commonplace things, because one could argue that the best ideas involve interest in remarkable things, which is what makes them the “best” ideas.

If the statement is viewed from the standpoint of all ideas from the beginning of civilization, then the statement holds true. Examples of commonplace things are food and shelter. If a person had an abundance of food and needed to transport it, they may have the idea to weave a basket or make some sort of tote in order to load more at once. With that idea, eventually the people would think of things to make the first idea more useful, such as adding wheels to your carrying device. With shelter, first people (Cro-Magnon)may have kept out of weather and unsafe territory by using caves as shelter. From passionate interest in the common shelter a person may have come up with brilliant ideas about structures, architecture, and construction.

In concern with the opposing view that the best ideas arise from remarkable things, one could argue that best ideas are medical breakthroughs and all other aspects of Science. Working with substances and molecules and creating ions and isotopes is not a commonplace thing. However, it is what the people who make the scientific breakthroughs have passionate interest in expanding.

Looking at the big picture, I would say that if people did not have “passionate interest in commonplace things”, then the idea that led us to the remarkable things would have never occurred. If that is true then the statement holds true because the best ideas do arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. Though some older ideas may seem obsolete now, there was a time that without those ideas, we would still be in the dark ages.

Overall, I agree with the statement. The best ideas do arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. Though I do not consider medical breakthroughs coming from interest in commonplace things, our species appears to be reaching the point in which cancer and AIDS could be considered a commonplace thing. If that is true, then when someone finds a cure for cancer or AIDS it will be one of the best ideas arising from a passionate interest in a commonplace thing. Once again reinforcing the truth of the statement.

Comments on sample essay receiving score of 4:

This response presents a competent analysis and conveys meaning adequately.

Paragraph 2 offers appropriate and adequately developed examples from “the beginning of civilization” to illustrate how commonplace needs inspire innovation: the need to transport food led to the invention of woven baskets and, eventually, the invention of the wheel; similarly, the need for shelter that drove “Cro-Magnon” to the caves eventually inspired “brilliant ideas about structures, architecture, and construction.”

Paragraph 3, which explores the “opposing view” (the best ideas arise from remarkable things), is less developed. The respondent claims that the best ideas are “medical breakthroughs and all other aspects of Science,” without explaining what is meant by “Science” or why these types of ideas are the “best.” Does “Science” include engineering, computer sciences, and the social sciences? Why are advances in science and medicine better than advances in religion the arts, or philosophy? The response also fails to acknowledge the commonplace interests (e.g., desire to improve quality of life) that drive medical/scientific research. While the response addresses two sides of the issue, it never delves into complexity the way a 5 or 6 would.

In paragraph 4, the response comes to a new conclusion: without initial interest in commonplace things, interest in remarkable things would be impossible. This is an interesting position that, if developed and supported with well-chosen examples, could lead to complex analysis. However, the conclusion is merely stated, loosely supported with generalities, and then further confounded by shaky logic in paragraph 5.

Ideas are expressed with reasonable clarity and the response generally demonstrates control of language. It is lack of complexity and logical development that keep this response from earning a higher score.